Sustainable Energy Coalition Urges Energy Bill Conferees to Reject Portions of House Electricity Proposal that are a Step Backward for Clean Energy
September 18, 2002
|
The
Honorable Jeff Bingaman
|
The
Honorable Billy Tauzin
|
|
The
Honorable Max Baucus
|
The
Honorable Joe Barton
|
|
The
Honorable John Breaux
|
The
Honorable Michael Bilirakis
|
|
The
Honorable Ernest Hollings
|
The
Honorable Richard Burr
|
|
The
Honorable John Kerry
|
The
Honorable Tom DeLay
|
|
The
Honorable Joseph Lieberman
|
The
Honorable Paul Gillmor
|
|
The
Honorable Harry Reid
|
The
Honorable Bobby Rush
|
|
The Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV
|
The
Honorable Cliff Stearns
|
|
The
Honorable James Jeffords
|
The
Honorable Rick Boucher
|
|
The
Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell
|
The
Honorable John Dingell
|
|
The
Honorable Larry Craig
|
The
Honorable Bart Gordon
|
|
The
Honorable Pete Domenici
|
The
Honorable Edward Markey
|
|
The
Honorable Charles Grassley
|
The
Honorable Fred Upton
|
|
The
Honorable Trent Lott
|
The
Honorable Henry Waxman
|
|
The
Honorable Frank Murkowski
|
|
|
The
Honorable Don Nickles
|
|
|
The
Honorable Craig Thomas
|
|
Dear Energy Bill Conferee;
We are writing to urge you, in tomorrow’s
consideration of the House Republican electricity proposal, to include
and strengthen the following provisions in order to ensure the increased
generation of clean energy and wider use of energy-efficient
technologies. The House Republican proposal not only fails to
incorporate provisions to increase the use of clean energy, but actually
takes a backward step by repealing the only federal law that requires
utilities to buy renewable power. The following critical policies need
to be satisfactorily addressed in both the House proposal and the Senate
bill.
Renewable Portfolio
Standard – The House proposal does not include a Renewable
Portfolio Standard. It also repeals the PURPA provisions that require
utilities to buy renewables, and requires a UTILITY to only submit a
plan for “diversifying” the fuels it uses, which may or may not
include renewables. The modest RPS
in the Senate bill, which could result in four to five percent of our
electricity being generated from new renewable sources by 2020, is a
good first step, but a truly effective RPS could result in 20 percent of our
electricity being generated from new renewable sources by 2020.
Net metering
– The House proposal and Senate bill both include net metering
provisions that are available to residential facilities of 10 kW or less
and commercial facilities of 500kW or less. Both
have good net metering provisions, but FERC must be given the authority to guarantee that states do not undermine their
effectiveness with onerous terms and conditions.
Interconnection
Standards – While both the House proposal and the Senate bill
provide interconnection safeguards for existing COGENERATION and
renewables systems, neither one contains satisfactory interconnection
standards for new Combined Heat and Power (CHP), FUEL CELL, and
RENEWABLE ENERGY systems. The Senate bill is lacking standards for
systems that are not qualifying facilities under PURPA, but are too
large to qualify for net metering, which is the vast majority of new
combined heat and power and renewable energy systems. The
bill must include requirements to allow new renewable, fuel cell, and
CHP systems to connect to the grid, as found in S. 933 and H.R. 1945.
Public Benefits
Fund (PBF) –Utility
investments in ENERGY EFFICIENCY and other public benefits have fallen
dramatically in recent years, increasing consumer energy bills, air
pollutant and GREENHOUSE GAS emissions, and the risk of blackouts.
Neither bill contains a national PBF to provide matching funds to states
and utilities for public benefits expenditures such as energy efficiency
and renewables programs, which would reduce.
Nor does either bill offer any effective alternative methods for
providing such funding.
Congress has a rare opportunity to pass a package
of comprehensive energy policies to increase our reliance on clean
renewable energy and energy efficiency policies, which will enhance our
national security, keep energy dollars at home, diversify our electric
supply, lower greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, improve
public health, and create jobs. We urge you to reject the portions of
the House proposal that are a step backwards for clean energy, and
instead vote to take balanced steps toward increased reliance on energy
efficiency and renewable energy.
Sincerely,
|
Alliance
to Save Energy
|
|
American
Bioenergy Association
|
|
American
Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
|
|
American
SOLAR ENERGY Society
|
|
Biorefiner,
Inc.
|
|
Cascade
Associates
|
|
Clean
Fuels Development Coalition
|
|
Environmental
and Energy Study Institute
|
|
GEOTHERMAL
Energy Association
|
|
National Environmental Trust
|
|
New Uses Council
|
|
Potomac Resources, Inc.
|
|
SOLAR Energy Industries Association
|
|
Union of Concerned Scientists
|