Accesskeys:

[`] Navigation, [s] Content, [=] Top of Page, [1] Home page

Highlight any text and click below

Next: Content. Select to move to navigation [`]

Site Content

Press Releases

Sustainable Energy Coalition Urges Energy Bill Conferees to Reject...

Wednesday, September 18, 2002

Sustainable Energy Coalition Urges Energy Bill Conferees to Reject Portions of House Electricity Proposal that are a Step Backward for Clean Energy

September 18, 2002

The Honorable Jeff Bingaman

The Honorable Billy Tauzin

The Honorable Max Baucus

The Honorable Joe Barton

The Honorable John Breaux

The Honorable Michael Bilirakis

The Honorable Ernest Hollings

The Honorable Richard Burr

The Honorable John Kerry

The Honorable Tom DeLay

The Honorable Joseph Lieberman

The Honorable Paul Gillmor

The Honorable Harry Reid

The Honorable Bobby Rush

The Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV

The Honorable Cliff Stearns

The Honorable James Jeffords

The Honorable Rick Boucher

The Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell

The Honorable John Dingell

The Honorable Larry Craig

The Honorable Bart Gordon

The Honorable Pete Domenici

The Honorable Edward Markey

The Honorable Charles Grassley

The Honorable Fred Upton

The Honorable Trent Lott

The Honorable Henry Waxman

The Honorable Frank Murkowski

 

The Honorable Don Nickles

 

The Honorable Craig Thomas

 

 

Dear Energy Bill Conferee;

We are writing to urge you, in tomorrow’s consideration of the House Republican electricity proposal, to include and strengthen the following provisions in order to ensure the increased generation of clean energy and wider use of energy-efficient technologies. The House Republican proposal not only fails to incorporate provisions to increase the use of clean energy, but actually takes a backward step by repealing the only federal law that requires utilities to buy renewable power. The following critical policies need to be satisfactorily addressed in both the House proposal and the Senate bill.

         Renewable Portfolio Standard – The House proposal does not include a Renewable Portfolio Standard. It also repeals the PURPA provisions that require utilities to buy renewables, and requires a UTILITY to only submit a plan for “diversifying” the fuels it uses, which may or may not include renewables. The modest RPS in the Senate bill, which could result in four to five percent of our electricity being generated from new renewable sources by 2020, is a good first step, but a truly effective RPS could result in 20 percent of our electricity being generated from new renewable sources by 2020.

         Net metering – The House proposal and Senate bill both include net metering provisions that are available to residential facilities of 10 kW or less and commercial facilities of 500kW or less. Both have good net metering provisions, but FERC must be given the authority to guarantee that states do not undermine their effectiveness with onerous terms and conditions.

         Interconnection Standards – While both the House proposal and the Senate bill provide interconnection safeguards for existing COGENERATION and renewables systems, neither one contains satisfactory interconnection standards for new Combined Heat and Power (CHP), FUEL CELL, and RENEWABLE ENERGY systems. The Senate bill is lacking standards for systems that are not qualifying facilities under PURPA, but are too large to qualify for net metering, which is the vast majority of new combined heat and power and renewable energy systems. The bill must include requirements to allow new renewable, fuel cell, and CHP systems to connect to the grid, as found in S. 933 and H.R. 1945.

         Public Benefits Fund (PBF) –Utility investments in ENERGY EFFICIENCY and other public benefits have fallen dramatically in recent years, increasing consumer energy bills, air pollutant and GREENHOUSE GAS emissions, and the risk of blackouts. Neither bill contains a national PBF to provide matching funds to states and utilities for public benefits expenditures such as energy efficiency and renewables programs, which would reduce.  Nor does either bill offer any effective alternative methods for providing such funding.

Congress has a rare opportunity to pass a package of comprehensive energy policies to increase our reliance on clean renewable energy and energy efficiency policies, which will enhance our national security, keep energy dollars at home, diversify our electric supply, lower greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, improve public health, and create jobs. We urge you to reject the portions of the House proposal that are a step backwards for clean energy, and instead vote to take balanced steps toward increased reliance on energy efficiency and renewable energy.

Sincerely,

Alliance to Save Energy

American Bioenergy Association

American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

American SOLAR ENERGY Society

Biorefiner, Inc.

Cascade Associates

Clean Fuels Development Coalition

Environmental and Energy Study Institute

GEOTHERMAL Energy Association

National Environmental Trust

New Uses Council

Potomac Resources, Inc.

SOLAR Energy Industries Association

Union of Concerned Scientists

 

Last Updated ( Monday, April 09, 2007 )
EESI Publications
  • It’s About How and Where We Build: Connecting Energy and Smart Growth
    (This updates our previous paper "Energy Smart Growth: It's about How and Where We Build," published by the Funders' Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities.)
  • Key Climate Facts
    On August 14, 2006, Dr. James E. Hansen, Director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies testified in the case of the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers et. al. v. the Secretary of Vermont, Agency of Natural Resources et. al. with regard to climate change. A number of Hansen’s key points are summarized here.
The Ethanol Report
Fuel Cells
Geothermal Reports