Accesskeys:

[`] Navigation, [s] Content, [=] Top of Page, [1] Home page

Highlight any text and click below

Next: Content. Select to move to navigation [`]

Site Content

Factoid #10

Written by Sustainable Energy Coalition Friday, April 06, 2007

WESTERN U.S. COULD REDUCE ELECTRICITY USE BY 20% FROM PROJECTED LEVELS BY 2020

On September 15, 2005 the ENERGY EFFICIENCY Task Force of the Western Governors' Association (WGA) submitted an 88-page draft report to the WGA’s Clean and Diversified Energy Advisory Committee.  The report evaluates the potential for increasing energy efficiency throughout the Western United States.

The Task Force reviewed seven major efficiency potential studies that have been completed in the WGA region in the past five years.  The studies vary in terms of their timeframe for projecting electricity savings potential, their geographical coverage, and their approach.  Some examine technical and economic savings potential only; others consider achievable savings potential from specific policies and programs.  Nonetheless, the studies as a whole show there is considerable cost-effective and achievable electricity savings potential in the western states.

In general, the efficiency potential studies show it is possible to reduce electricity demand growth by 0.5-2 percent per year through more concerted energy efficiency efforts.  Studies that consider a wider set of efficiency measures and more aggressive implementation strategies tend to project savings at the higher end of this range, while those with more limited measures and/or more conservative assumptions about measure adoptions are at the lower end.  The studies that examined potential net economic benefits all found that more aggressive, multi-year energy efficiency efforts could save consumers and businesses billions of dollars, with very favorable benefit-cost ratios.

Specifically, the report says it is feasible for the region to reduce electricity use by 20 percent from projected levels in 2020 through full deployment of Best Practice policies and programs. This is the equivalent of electricity supplied by 100 baseload power plants - that is, 48,000 MW of avoided power plant construction during 2005-2020.

Moreover, even greater electricity savings may be possible through adoption of other strategies not included in the Task Force's Best Practices scenario, such as research & development, technology transfer, and pricing initiatives.

Implementing the Best Practice energy efficiency policies and programs would provide substantial economic benefits for households and businesses in western states.  By 2020, these efforts could lower consumer electricity bills in aggregate by $21 billion per year.  Furthermore, the Best Practices scenario would yield $53 billion in net economic benefits during 2005-2020 on a net present value basis, with an overall benefit-cost ratio of 2.5.  The benefits result mainly from avoided fuel purchases by utilities, and avoided investment in generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure.

Implementing the Best Practices energy efficiency policies and programs would also provide some air emissions benefits.  CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) emissions would decline the most (17 percent by 2020) since CO2 is not a controlled pollutant. In addition, NOx emissions by power plants would decline a moderate amount (7 percent by 2020) in the Best Practices scenario, relative to the Reference Scenario.

Energy efficiency best practices would also result in water savings from both increased use of energy and water saving devices in homes and businesses, and less operation of steam-based power plants.  The Task Force estimates that the Best Practices scenario would save 260 billion gallons of water per year by 2020 relative to the Reference Scenario, equivalent to the annual water use of about 1.4 million households.  Total water savings during 2005-2020 in this scenario would be approximately 1.8 trillion gallons.

The report notes that some western states have already taken important steps to increase energy efficiency but stresses that “much more can and should be done.  Accordingly, the Task Force lists policies that should be put in place to achieve these dramatic savings. These include a requirement that utilities invest at least 2 percent of their revenues into energy efficiency programs.

The extensive and detailed policy recommendations fall into the following categories:

  • Electric UTILITY Demand-Side Management Programs
  • Gas Utility Demand-Side Management Programs
  • Building Energy Codes
  • Appliance Efficiency Standards
  • Public Sector Initiatives
  • Financial Incentives
  • Pricing Policies
  • Education and Training
  • Technology R&D and Transfer
  • Regional-Level Initiatives

 

The full text of the study can be found at:
 
<http://www.westgov.org/wga/initiatives/cdeac/Energyefficiencydraft9-15.pdf>




Did you enjoy this article? Recommend and bookmark it...Digg!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blinklist!Blogmarks!Yahoo!
Last Updated ( Friday, October 12, 2007 )
< Prev   Next >
Upcoming Events
11th Annual Congressional EERE EXPO
EESI Publications
  • It’s About How and Where We Build: Connecting Energy and Smart Growth
    (This updates our previous paper "Energy Smart Growth: It's about How and Where We Build," published by the Funders' Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities.)
  • Key Climate Facts
    On August 14, 2006, Dr. James E. Hansen, Director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies testified in the case of the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers et. al. v. the Secretary of Vermont, Agency of Natural Resources et. al. with regard to climate change. A number of Hansen’s key points are summarized here.
The Ethanol Report
Fuel Cells
Geothermal Reports